Supreme Court· 6/15/2023
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 599 U.S. 236
Oral argument
- ListenArgued77 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution does not bar retrial when a conviction is reversed due to improper venue, since improper venue does not adjudicate a defendant’s culpability
- “The reversal of a conviction based on a violation of the Venue and Vicinage Clauses . . . plainly does not resolve the bottom-line question of criminal culpability.” (quotation omitted)
- describing Jackalow as a case about whether “venue existed”
- “Except as prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause, it ‘has long been the rule that when a defendant obtains reversal of a prior, unsatisfied conviction, he may be retried in the normal course of events.’” (quoting United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116, 121 (1966))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Samuel Alito
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McElrath v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 2024-02-21· cited 23×
- United States v. AbbasFirst Circuit· 2024-04-29· cited 15×
- United States v. Victor Everette SilversSixth Circuit· 2025-02-20· cited 3×
- People v. HenryAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-01-17· cited 1×
- United States v. Stephen PurksFourth Circuit· 2025-06-05· cited 1×
- Thomas Edward Clark v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-10-17
- State of Arizona v. Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-02-08
- Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-05-30
- David Lionel Williams v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2025-06-26
- Jimmy Allen v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2024-03-05
- Donald Quinn a/k/a Donald Ray Quinn v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2024-02-20
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Douglas Paulson, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-06-11
- State of Minnesota v. John Tyrus AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-04-15
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,102×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-01-11· cited 1,678×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court· 2005-05-31· cited 1,462×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 1,159×
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-05-27· cited 1,102×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.