Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/15/2023

Smith v. United States

Citations

  • 599 U.S. 236

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution does not bar retrial when a conviction is reversed due to improper venue, since improper venue does not adjudicate a defendant’s culpability
  • “The reversal of a conviction based on a violation of the Venue and Vicinage Clauses . . . plainly does not resolve the bottom-line question of criminal culpability.” (quotation omitted)
  • describing Jackalow as a case about whether “venue existed”
  • “Except as prohibited by the Double Jeopardy Clause, it ‘has long been the rule that when a defendant obtains reversal of a prior, unsatisfied conviction, he may be retried in the normal course of events.’” (quoting United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116, 121 (1966))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Samuel Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.