Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 302 Ga. 699
  • 808 S.E.2d 692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s 28 “thorough curative instruction,” mentioning “drugs” four times in instructing the jury that a witness’s reference to drugs was to be disregarded, was “sufficient to counter any alleged harm caused by the witness’s brief statement”
  • holding that the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a mistrial was not erroneous and a “curative instruction was sufficient to counter any alleged harm caused by the witness’s brief statement” about the defendant’s involvement with drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.