Skip to main content

Graves v. State

Citations

  • 298 Ga. 551
  • 783 S.E.2d 891
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is axiomatic that resolving evidentiary conflicts and assessing witness credibility are within the exclusive province of the jury.”
  • “[I]t is axiomatic that resolving evidentiary conflicts and assessing witness credibility are within the exclusive province of the jury.” (citing Hampton v. State, 272 Ga. 284, 285 (1) (527 SE2d 872) (2000))
  • “Though [the defendant] contends that the evidence was insufficient because the State’s witnesses were impeached or incredible, it is axiomatic that resolving evidentiary conflicts and assessing witness credibility are within the exclusive province of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.