Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 887 S.W.2d 601
  • 1994 Mo. LEXIS 76
  • 1994 WL 663374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a successive Rule 29.15 motion was invalid, even when the first Rule 29.15 motion was procedurally barred and not decided on the merits
  • holding motion court did not err in dismissing second Rule 29.15 motion as successive, even in capital case where first post- conviction motion not heard on merits due to counsel’s failure to timely file

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Covington, Holstein, Limbaugh, Price, Robertson, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.