Skip to main content
· 6/21/2011

Burston v. State

Citations

  • 343 S.W.3d 691
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 869
  • 2011 WL 2453492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding motion court did not clearly err in denying movant’s second Rule 29.15 motion as successive, even where movant’s first Rule 29.15 motion was dismissed without 10 prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia L. Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.