Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 95 So. 3d 966
  • 2012 WL 3537226
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to suppress and reversing and remanding with instructions to discharge the appellant for the offense
  • reversing denial of suppression where \the incriminating nature of the pills was not immediately apparent to the deputy such that he had probable cause to seize the bag under the plain-view doctrine\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Lewis, Marstiller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.