Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 158 A.3d 1154
  • 232 Md. App. 583
  • 2017 WL 1534890
  • 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “that if an act is part of the alleged offense, the act does not constitute an ‘other’ act to which the rule applies”
  • finding that evidence of the defendant spitting was admissible to support the charge of threatening a state official because the spitting and oral threats occurred in the same location, in the same half hour interview, and there were no intervening events separating the two incidents
  • finding that evidence of the defendant spitting was admissible to support the charge of threatening a state official because the spitting and oral threats occurred in the same location, in the same half hour interview, and there were no intervening events separating the two incidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Wright, Zarnoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.