Skip to main content

Hobbs v. State

Citations

  • 251 P.3d 177
  • 127 Nev. 234
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 18
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the act of spitting on another is a battery
  • explaining that when Nevada copies a statute from another state, that state's subsequent case law interpreting the statute constitutes \persuasive authority\
  • explaining that the physical force required for battery includes \the intentional and unwanted exertion of force upon another\ (emphasis added)
  • explaining that when a statute is copied from another state, the other state's caselaw interpreting the statute is \persuasive authority\
  • reviewing validity of defendant’s prior misdemeanor convictions that were used to enhance charged offense to a felony under NRS 200.485
  • considering California’s caselaw interpreting its battery statute to interpret Nevada’s similar statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.