Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 656 So. 2d 95
  • 1995 WL 274925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a limiting instruction is required where evidence of a prior conviction is admitted over objection
  • finding that while evidence of a prior incident was admissible on the question of intent, it was insufficient standing alone to support conviction beyond a reasonable doubt
  • holding in drug possession case that evidence of past drug sales alone is \an insufficient evidentiary basis for the conclusion that present possession is with the intent to distribute\
  • stating evidence of prior drug sales is admissible to prove intent when accompanied by a limiting instruction
  • stating evidence of prior drug sales is admissible to prove intent when accompanied by a limiting instruction under 403
  • concerning sua sponte limiting/cautionary instruction in a case involving possession with intent to distribute drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.