Lanoue v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting respondent's concession that witness's testimony contributed to the verdict in holding that the district court's error was not harmless
• competency determination was improper where trial testimony of a five-year-old witness was not clear, relevant and coherent and suggested a substantial amount of coaching
• competency determination held improper where trial testimony of five-year-old witness was not clear, relevant, and coherent and suggested a substantial amount of coaching
• competency determination held improper where trial testimony of five-year-old witness was not clear, relevant, and coherent and suggested a substantial amount of coaching
• competency determination held improper where trial testimony of five-year-old witness was not clear, relevant, and coherent and suggested a substantial amount of coaching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).