Terrell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for a deposition to be used as substantive evidence, it must be taken in compliance with rule 3.190, not rule 3.220
• “substantive use of a deposition taken solely for the purpose of discovery has been held to be improper under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.” At 1040-1
• discovery deposition erroneously admitted at trial when court determined witness was unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-08· cited 89×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-12-21· cited 50×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-04· cited 31×
• Palm Beach Newspapers v. Burk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-11· cited 17×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-13· cited 8×
• Barnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-02· cited 7×
• Campos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-17· cited 7×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-15· cited 6×
• State v. Skolar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 5×
• Latrail Onrillious Jones v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-25· cited 2×
• State v. Burch
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1989-04-21
• Department of Education v. Hernandez
  State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings· 1990-09-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Basiliere
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-10-20· cited 37×
• State v. James
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 20×