Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 115 S.W.3d 303
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7587
  • 2003 WL 22025878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court does not abuse its discretion if 11 some evidence of substantive and probative character supports its decision
  • concluding that community property and liabilities apportioned to a spouse, along with a spouse’s ability to meet independent needs are relevant factors in a trial court’s award of spousal maintenance
  • stating that a trial court does not abuse its discretion if there is some evidence of a substantive and probative character to support the decision
  • considering, as relevant factors, community properties and liabilities apportioned to spouse in divorce as well as spouse’s ability to meet his needs independently
  • upholding maintenance award when parties presented conflicting evidence concerning husband’s ability to work
  • upholding an award of spousal maintenance to disabled husband for nine years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Yáñez, Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.