Reina v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \exclusion of cumulative evidence is not reversible error\
• holding that the “exclusion of cumulative evidence is not reversible error”
• stating there is no reversible error if admissibility ruling involves cumulative evidence
• stating there is no reversible error if admissibility ruling involves cumulative evidence
• stating there is no reversible error if admissibility ruling involves cumulative evidence
• no medical evidence of disability required in case decided under former workers’ compensation statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).