District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/9/1973
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 310 A.2d 229
- 1973 D.C. App. LEXIS 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]here the ultimate question depends on contingencies which may not come about[J that question is not ripe for judicial resolution.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reilly, Kern, Nebeker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-28· cited 99×
- District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-29· cited 93×
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-07· cited 80×
- R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. CurtinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-27· cited 61×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-07· cited 40×
- Hessey v. BurdenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-29· cited 39×
- Gray v. Citizens Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-04-13· cited 30×
- In Re Estate of ChuongDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-03-02· cited 26×
- Matter of Baby Girl DSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-27· cited 24×
- Mahoney v. Smith (In Re Smith)E.D. Virginia· 1980-03-14· cited 22×
- Cormier v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-10-30· cited 19×
- District Intown Properties, Ltd. v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 18×
- Television Capital Corp. of Mobile v. Paxson Communications Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-16· cited 12×
- Hardesty v. DraperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-01-23· cited 11×
- Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Labor Committee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-04-02· cited 10×
- In re D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-07-13· cited 9×
- Matthews Ex Rel. Matthews v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-06-02· cited 8×
- Woodward v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-21· cited 8×
- Hall v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-12· cited 8×
- Metropolitan Baptist Church v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-09-03· cited 8×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court· 1945-06-11· cited 581×
- Spock v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-10-20· cited 29×
- Linus Pauling v. James O. EastlandD.C. Circuit· 1960-09-07· cited 28×
- Oliver v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-06-26· cited 20×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-08-03· cited 14×
- Crump v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.