Skip to main content

Hessey v. Burden

Citations

  • 615 A.2d 562
  • 1992 WL 312830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing various state cases regarding pre-election challenges to the validity of proposed initiatives
  • reviewing various states' cases regarding pre-election challenges to the validity of proposed initiatives
  • reviewing various state cases regarding pre-election challenges to the validity of proposed initiatives
  • reviewing various states’ cases regarding pre-election challenges to the validity of proposed*initiatives
  • “[W]hether a measure is a ‘proper subject of initiative’ should be answered in its entirety before the summary statement, short title, and legislative form are even prepared.”
  • “We agree with the majority of courts which hold that [preenaetment] review is imprudent. But there may be extreme cases in which it would be both appropriate and efficient to decide the constitutionality of a proposed initiative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Farrell, Wagner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hessey v. Burden

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.