Metropolitan Baptist Church v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to permit requirements was not fit for review where the effect of being subject to the requirements was undetermined
• challenge to permit requirements was not fit for review where the effect of being subject to the requirements was undetermined
• challenge to agency action was not fit for review where merits of that challenge could not “be determined as a legal matter but depended] on the development of facts which [were] absent from the record before us”
• challenge to agency action was not fit for review where merits of that challenge could not \be determined as a legal matter but depend[ed] on the development of facts which [were] absent from the record before us\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).