Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/9/2009

Smith v. Smith

Citations

687 S.E.2d 720
386 S.C. 251
2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the family court’s decision on remand may alter its “analysis of the ‘beneficial results obtained at trial’ ”
finding property non-marital based on testimony, financial records, and lack of evidence of the parties treating it as martial property during their marriage
reversing and remanding to the family court the issue of whether the cost of continued private school attendance was an appropriate deviation from the Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Huff, Lockemy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.