Arizona Supreme Court· 12/28/1961
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 367 P.2d 230
- 90 Ariz. 190
- 1961 Ariz. LEXIS 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not-ing a value in letting a child see the religious models between which a choice will likely be made later in life, and that a diversity of religious experience could be beneficial to the child
- Jehovah’s Witness mother; no showing of “circumstances materially affecting” welfare of child; order changing custody reversed
- “[A] parent may not be deprived of the custody of a child because of the court’s disagreement with such parent as to religious beliefs.”
- \A judgment supported only by the tenuous threads of a possible neuroses [sic] derived from deviation in normal activities will not withstand the thrust of constitutional guarantees.\
- “[I]f a teaching does not conflict with the fundamental law of the land a parent may not be deprived of the custody of a child because of the court’s disagreement with such parent as to religious beliefs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Udall, Jennings, Lockwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Felton v. FeltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-03-31· cited 75×
- Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-09-02· cited 71×
- In Re the Marriage of McSoudColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-02-09· cited 55×
- Osier v. OsierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-02-04· cited 48×
- Dunbar v. DunbarArizona Supreme Court· 1967-07-07· cited 42×
- Black v. BlackArizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-08· cited 38×
- Mollish v. MollishCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-11-17· cited 35×
- Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-03-29· cited 32×
- Levitsky v. LevitskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-07· cited 30×
- Clift v. CliftCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1977-02-09· cited 23×
- Meredith v. MeredithIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-11-22· cited 22×
- Borg v. BorgCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-05-04· cited 15×
- Stapley v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-16· cited 15×
- Allison v. OvensCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-03-29· cited 12×
- In Re the Marriage of HadeenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-11-03· cited 12×
- Garrett v. GarrettNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-01-31· cited 8×
- Ball v. BallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-12-10· cited 7×
- Porter v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-02-06· cited 6×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-01-25· cited 5×
- Mendez v. MendezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-28· cited 3×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 2,477×
- Minersville School District v. GobitisSupreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 244×
- Bond v. BondWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1959-06-02· cited 71×
- McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court· 1921-03-30· cited 49×
- Ward v. WardArizona Supreme Court· 1960-06-30· cited 48×
- Davis v. DavisArizona Supreme Court· 1954-11-29· cited 38×
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-04-06· cited 32×
- Galbraith v. GalbraithArizona Supreme Court· 1960-11-16· cited 30×
- Cone v. RighettiArizona Supreme Court· 1952-02-11· cited 26×
- Bradstreet v. BradstreetArizona Supreme Court· 1928-11-13· cited 23×
- Cory v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-18· cited 22×
- Salvaggio v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-04-17· cited 19×
- Schulze v. SchulzeArizona Supreme Court· 1955-05-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.