Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/4/1966
Borg v. Borg
Citations
- 413 P.2d 784
- 3 Ariz. App. 274
- 1966 Ariz. App. LEXIS 600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he primary consideration in custody cases is the welfare and best interests of the children.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krucker, Hathaway, Molloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stapley v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-16· cited 15×
- In Re AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-01-12· cited 7×
- Nicaise v. SundaramCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-03-01· cited 4×
- Fenter v. GruensfelderCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-01-12· cited 1×
- Earley v. EarleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-16· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fought v. FoughtArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-20· cited 52×
- Ward v. WardArizona Supreme Court· 1960-06-30· cited 48×
- Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-03-29· cited 32×
- Smith v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1961-12-28· cited 30×
- Galbraith v. GalbraithArizona Supreme Court· 1960-11-16· cited 30×
- Andro v. AndroArizona Supreme Court· 1965-03-17· cited 29×
- Clifford v. WoodfordArizona Supreme Court· 1957-12-31· cited 24×
- Bourland v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-06-25· cited 17×
- Ward v. WardArizona Supreme Court· 1960-10-19· cited 15×
- Rodgers v. De ArmanArizona Supreme Court· 1966-04-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.