· 5/15/1837
Galbraith v. Galbraith
Citations
- 6 Watts 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant's argument that Commonwealth was required to prove that his conduct in a public restroom was intentionally open and public
- conduct between two men in public toilet qualified as \open\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sergeant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.