Skip to main content
· 5/15/1837

Galbraith v. Galbraith

Citations

  • 6 Watts 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant's argument that Commonwealth was required to prove that his conduct in a public restroom was intentionally open and public
  • conduct between two men in public toilet qualified as \open\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sergeant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.