Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 5/9/2014

Smith v. Mikki More, LLC

Citations

  • 21 F. Supp. 3d 276
  • 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1746
  • 2014 WL 1875929
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “unjust enrichment and quantum meruit sound in quasi-contract”
  • complaint adequately alleged a corporate officer’s individual liability for direct and vicarious copyright infringement where officer “was an active participant” in the infringement
  • “‘[W]here the parties agree that New York law controls, this is sufficient to establish choice of law.’” (quoting Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir. 2011))
  • “Both parties cite New York law in their arguments concerning plaintiffs’ quasi-contract claim. ‘(Where the parties agree that New York law controls, this is sufficient to establish choice of law.’ Fed. Ins. Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 639 F.3d 557, 566 (2d Cir. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.