Boisson v. Banian Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding appropriate to “review the complaint and briefs to make sure that the allegations supporting the longer class period are not obviously frivolous”
• collecting cases, and noting that “courts agree that they should not make any binding determinations regarding the proper class period as part of the lead-plaintiff analysis” because § 78u–4(a)(4)(B)(iii)(I)(bb
• “[C]ourts usually . . . use the most inclusive class period and select as lead plaintiff the movant with the largest financial interest under that period”
• “[C]ourts usually . . . use the most inclusive class period and select as lead plaintiff the movant with the largest financial interest under that period”
• “[C]ourts usually . . . use the most inclusive class period and select as lead plaintiff the movant with the largest financial interest under that period”
• adopting “obviously frivolous” test at the lead plaintiff stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).