Fischer & Mandell LLP v. Citibank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[s]ummary judgment is appropriate if the terms of the contract are unambiguous”
• stating that “Article 4 precludes common law claims that would impose liability inconsistent with the rights and liabilities expressly created by Article 4” while allowing an exception for a common law breach of contract claim in that instance
• finding that a negligence claim brought by a plaintiff who authorized a wire transfer and then attempted to cancel it after learning that the check providing the funds for the transfer was forged, was preempted by Article 4-A
• finding that a negligence claim brought by a plaintiff who authorized a wire transfer and then attempted to cancel it after learning that the check providing the funds for the transfer was forged, was preempted by Article 4-A
• treating the sender’s “instruction to recall the wire transfers” as an attempt to “request to cancel”
• treating the sender’s “instruction to recall the wire transfers” as an attempt to “request to cancel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).