Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/25/1988

Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

527 N.E.2d 333
173 Ill. App. 3d 1
122 Ill. Dec. 835
1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that parallel activity by drug manufacturers in producing and marketing DES does not establish civil conspiracy or concerted action
holding that parallel activity by drug manufacturers in producing and marketing DES does not establish civil conspiracy or concerted action
holding that parallel activity by drug manufacturers in producing and marketing DES does not establish civil conspiracy or concerted action
rejecting market share theory in DES context on policy grounds and categorizing approach as more appropriately within the legislative domain
rejecting market share theory in DES context on policy grounds and categorizing approach as more appropriately within the legislative domain
rejecting concerted action theory of liability premised on allegations of joint submission of clinical data in applications for Food and Drug Administration approval of a drug

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.