Alaska Supreme Court· 6/9/1978
Witt v. Watkins
Citations
- 579 P.2d 1065
- 1978 Alas. LEXIS 523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying objective test to overturn release, yet acknowledging that any mistake of fact was unilateral
- applying objective test to overturn release, yet acknowledging that any mistake of fact was unilateral
- “Where a resolution of a particular question is of significant public interest, we may, in our discretion, resolve it despite the fact that the parties have settled their dispute.”
- “where a resolution of a particular question is of significant public interest, we may, in our own discretion, resolve it despite the fact that the parties have settled their dispute”
- “Where a resolution of a particular question is of significant public interest, we may, in our discretion, resolve it despite the fact that the parties have settled their dispute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Witz, Connor, Burke, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 287×
- gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-02-15· cited 144×
- Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-08-25· cited 72×
- Cameron v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-12-03· cited 48×
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 42×
- Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-05-21· cited 42×
- Gossinger v. Association of Apartment Owners of the RegencyHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-08-25· cited 39×
- Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 2009-04-03· cited 37×
- Philbin v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-11-19· cited 32×
- Horgan v. Industrial Design Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 28×
- Bennett v. Shinoda Floral, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 27×
- Smith v. ClearyAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-06-22· cited 26×
- Alaska Community Colleges' Federation of Teachers, Local No. 2404 v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court· 1984-02-03· cited 25×
- Zeilinger v. SOHIO Alaska Petroleum Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-01-03· cited 24×
- Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-05-02· cited 22×
- Ahwinona v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-08-16· cited 19×
- Mitchell v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-11-12· cited 18×
- Old Harbor Native Corp. v. Afognak Joint VentureAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-09-07· cited 18×
- Maglin v. TschannerlSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-05-24· cited 17×
- Schmidt v. LashleyAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-04-24· cited 12×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 499×
- RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 178×
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-02-14· cited 110×
- Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Second Circuit· 1946-01-10· cited 106×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-01-23· cited 96×
- Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1975-02-27· cited 81×
- Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 74×
- Clancy v. PacentiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1957-12-05· cited 58×
- Maguire v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1970-09-02· cited 47×
- Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1913-12-31· cited 36×
- Finch v. CarltonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-07-25· cited 35×
- Schmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-29· cited 35×
- Ranta v. RakeIdaho Supreme Court· 1966-12-21· cited 33×
- Lion Oil Refining Co. v. AlbrittonEighth Circuit· 1927-07-22· cited 21×
- In re the Estate of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1931-11-11· cited 17×
- Fraser v. GlassAppellate Court of Illinois· 1941-08-14· cited 14×
- Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association v. FridenaArizona Supreme Court· 1970-01-15· cited 13×
- City of Albuquerque v. CamposNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-08-16· cited 13×
- Seidman v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court· 1937-03-25· cited 12×
- Meade v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-06-05· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.