District of Columbia· 5/26/2017
Smith v. Clinton
Citations
- 253 F. Supp. 3d 222
- 2017 WL 2312863
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the FTCA's exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused” and stating that futility applies only to non-jurisdictional exhaustion
- holding that “the FTCA’s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused” and stating that futility applies only to non- jurisdictional exhaustion
- holding that “the FTCA's exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused”
- rejecting plaintiffs contention that “exhaustion would be futile” because the “FTCA’s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excised”
- rejecting defamation claim based on Secretary Clinton's denial of plaintiff's accusation that she lied to them about what caused the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya
- \A court must also determine the threshold question of law of whether the statement is false.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patricia Smith v. Hillary ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2018-03-27· cited 35×
- Libre by Nexus v. Buzzfeed, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 15×
- Libre by Nexus v. Buzzfeed, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-05-16
- Corsi v. MuellerDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-31
- Hu v. K4 Solutions, IncDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-12
- Butler v. AugustineDistrict of Columbia· 2020-05-06
- Sargent v. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2020-09-11
- Driever v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2020-10-19
- Norton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-18
- Driever v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2021-05-14
- B&S Glass, Incorporated v. Del Metro, IncorporatedDistrict of Columbia· 2021-07-30
- Burnside v. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-10
- Bennett v. Fedex Corp.District of Columbia· 2022-06-09
- Andrade v. General Services AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2024-01-05
- Wilson v. ConklinDistrict of Columbia· 2024-02-23
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 4,367×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 3,438×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,832×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court· 1992-03-04· cited 1,480×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 1,308×
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 1979-09-07· cited 925×
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICD.C. Circuit· 2011-06-24· cited 828×
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 628×
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 582×
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 571×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.