Skip to main content

Smith v. Clinton

Citations

  • 253 F. Supp. 3d 222
  • 2017 WL 2312863
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the FTCA's exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused” and stating that futility applies only to non-jurisdictional exhaustion
  • holding that “the FTCA’s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused” and stating that futility applies only to non- jurisdictional exhaustion
  • holding that “the FTCA's exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excused”
  • rejecting plaintiffs contention that “exhaustion would be futile” because the “FTCA’s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be excised”
  • rejecting defamation claim based on Secretary Clinton's denial of plaintiff's accusation that she lied to them about what caused the 2012 attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya
  • \A court must also determine the threshold question of law of whether the statement is false.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amy Berman Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.