Smathers v. Smathers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Court cannot act as a pro se litigant’s attorney and develop the argument
• reiterating that this Court may construe a pro se litigant’s material liberally but will not act as his attorney
• noting that “this court is willing to liberally construe materials filed by a pro se litigant,” but warning that an “appellant is not entitled to any particular advantage because she lacks legal training”
• stating noncompliance with Rule 2116 is particularly grievous because statement of questions involved defines specific issues for review
• stating noncompliance with Rule 2116 concerning statement of questions involved is particularly grievous because statement of questions involved defines specific issues for review
• stating noncompliance with Rule 2116 is particularly grievous because statement of questions involved defines specific issues for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).