Skip to main content
· 8/13/1993

Commonwealth v. Maris

Citations

  • 629 A.2d 1014
  • 427 Pa. Super. 566
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this Court is not required to consider arguments not set forth in a statement of questions involved
  • stating that omission of statement of issues presented is particularly grievous since statement of questions involved defines specific issues this Court is asked to review
  • stating that omission of statement of issues presented is particularly grievous since statement of questions involved defines specific issues this Court is asked to review
  • stating that omission of statement of issues presented is particularly grievous since statement of questions involved defines specific issues this Court is asked to review
  • stating noncompliance with Rule -3- J-A10037-16 2116 is particularly grievous because statement of questions involved defines specific issues for review
  • quashing appeal where substantial defects prevent this Court from conducting meaningful appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Olszewski, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.