District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/16/2005
Sloss v. State
Citations
- 917 So. 2d 941
- 2005 WL 3439876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “These motions . . . are in no way dispositive as a reversal would merely result in remand for further proceedings, including the possibility of a trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ruilova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-28· cited 7×
- Beermunder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-18· cited 3×
- Ferran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-02· cited 1×
- Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-06· cited 1×
- Edward Lamont Hicks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-23
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-14· cited 169×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-01· cited 8×
- Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-12· cited 5×
- Werner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 4×
- Hedglin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.