Pena v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[b]ecause we have concluded that the order on appeal was not dis-positive and the exception to the rule does not apply, we have no jurisdiction to reach the merits of this case.”
• stipulation in plea agreement that defendant could plead no contest reserving the right to appeal denial of his motion to participate in drug court did not confer appellate jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Batista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-21· cited 6×
• Sloss v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-16· cited 5×
• Beermunder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-18· cited 3×
• Aybar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-23
• TIFFANY GRAVES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-01-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Finney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-05· cited 48×
• City of West Palm Beach v. PALM BEACH CTY.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-10· cited 23×
• Dicaprio v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-10· cited 16×
• Hewlett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-13· cited 11×
• Levine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 11×
• Weber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-13· cited 9×
• Zambuto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-17· cited 7×
• Mullin v. Jenne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-12· cited 4×
• Gardner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-09· cited 3×
• Lamour v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-20· cited 2×