Ninth Circuit· 4/14/1994
Sloman v. Tadlock
Citations
- 21 F.3d 1462
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 4971
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2602
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where [] officials are forced to go to trial because their right to immunity turns on the resolution of disputed facts, … the qualified immunity determination should be made by the jury if it is based on facts which are genuinely in dispute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioNinth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 4,653×
- Gary Blankenhorn v. City of Orange Andy Romero Dung Nguyen Garrett Ross Tamara South Gray, Sergeant Montano, Officer Kayano, Officer Roman, OfficerNinth Circuit· 2007-05-08· cited 709×
- Menotti v. City of SeattleNinth Circuit· 2005-06-01· cited 293×
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 236×
- A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolNinth Circuit· 2013-04-03· cited 152×
- Maria Morales v. Sonya FryNinth Circuit· 2017-10-16· cited 151×
- Tortu v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNinth Circuit· 2009-03-03· cited 142×
- Tatro v. KervinFirst Circuit· 1994-12-01· cited 98×
- Lamont Shepard v. T. QuillenNinth Circuit· 2016-10-26· cited 92×
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyNinth Circuit· 1995-11-30· cited 45×
- Mendocino Environmental Center v. Mendocino CountyNinth Circuit· 1999-09-24· cited 45×
- Kevin Simmons v. G. ArnettNinth Circuit· 2022-08-31· cited 44×
- Newman v. County of OrangeNinth Circuit· 2006-08-07· cited 43×
- Reyes v. City of LynchburgFourth Circuit· 2002-08-16· cited 38×
- Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of HumboldtNinth Circuit· 2001-01-31· cited 28×
- Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-26· cited 19×
- Kelly v. City of OaklandNinth Circuit· 1999-11-23· cited 17×
- Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of HumboldtNinth Circuit· 2000-05-04· cited 16×
- Wong v. City & County of HonoluluD. Hawaii· 2004-08-26· cited 12×
- The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa MesaNinth Circuit· 2024-12-04· cited 11×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 3,271×
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 1,171×
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannNinth Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 1,059×
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1975-11-28· cited 1,048×
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 720×
- Gibson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 522×
- Cali v. Japan Airlines Co.Supreme Court· 1976-04-26· cited 483×
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyNinth Circuit· 1992-07-24· cited 468×
- Robert E. Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, and County of Los Angeles, University of California at Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 1989-09-18· cited 361×
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionNinth Circuit· 1992-07-01· cited 322×
- McKinley v. City of EloyNinth Circuit· 1983-05-09· cited 313×
- Brian Barlow v. Officer George Ground, I.D. 9129Ninth Circuit· 1991-09-05· cited 226×
- Leslie D. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 178×
- Cabrales v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 1988-12-28· cited 177×
- Davis v. Mason CountyNinth Circuit· 1991-03-12· cited 175×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.