Ninth Circuit· 7/24/1992
Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley
Citations
- 988 F.2d 868
- 1993 WL 29109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the qualified immunity determination does not entail an inquiry into the officer’s subjective intentions; merely his knowledge
- “[T]he determination of what conduct underlies the alleged violation—what the officer and claimant did or failed to do—is a determination of fact.”
- “If a genuine issue of fact exists preventing a determination of qualified immunity at summary judgment, the case must proceed to trial.”
- the question is whether a reasonable officer in defendant's position could have believed his actions were lawful
- “[i]f a genuine issue of fact exists as to “what the officer and claimant did or failed to do,” qualified immunity at summary judgment is inappropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Leavy, Norris, Scannlain
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
287 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Devereaux v. AbbeyNinth Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 1,256×
- Trevino v. GatesNinth Circuit· 1996-11-01· cited 1,012×
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-10-23· cited 980×
- White v. LeeNinth Circuit· 2000-09-27· cited 786×
- Scott v. HenrichNinth Circuit· 1994-09-09· cited 544×
- George Thomas Franklin v. Jim Fox Martin Murray Robert Morse Bryan Cassandro John Cuneo, Sergeant Eileen Franklin-LipskerNinth Circuit· 2002-11-27· cited 474×
- Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarNinth Circuit· 2012-06-20· cited 467×
- Chew v. GatesNinth Circuit· 1994-06-27· cited 390×
- Schroeder v. McDonaldNinth Circuit· 1995-05-19· cited 359×
- John Louis Lalonde v. County of Riverside, Robert Moquin, and Jason Horton, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-02-25· cited 354×
- Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-05-16· cited 309×
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 2010-02-09· cited 291×
- Charles M. Grossman, M.D. v. City of Portland, a Public Body, and Todd DavisNinth Circuit· 1994-09-06· cited 280×
- Gasho v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1994-11-02· cited 270×
- Jeffers v. GomezNinth Circuit· 2001-10-03· cited 265×
- Ronald Mendoza v. Sherman Block, Los Angeles CountyNinth Circuit· 1994-05-31· cited 245×
- Harris v. RoderickNinth Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 240×
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 236×
- Washington v. LambertNinth Circuit· 1996-10-28· cited 225×
- Liston v. County of RiversideNinth Circuit· 1997-07-21· cited 223×
Other cases named Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.