Slesinski v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An award of a higher VA rating does not establish error or injustice in the Army rating.”
• describing the Army’s disability evaluation process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stine v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-05-10· cited 42×
• Myers v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-10-31· cited 27×
• Santiago v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-03-15· cited 17×
• Santiago v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-05-03· cited 16×
• Pomory v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1997-10-21· cited 10×
• Wollman v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-02-06· cited 9×
• Johnson v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-07-16· cited 7×
• Stein v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2015-05-27· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 7,564×
• David W. Heisig v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1983-10-19· cited 462×
• Victoria M. Voge v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1988-04-19· cited 265×
• Skinner v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-02-21· cited 182×
• Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the Army
  Federal Circuit· 1993-04-14· cited 159×
• Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air Force
  Federal Circuit· 1985-02-04· cited 114×
• Stephens v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1966-02-18· cited 56×
• Curry v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-11-14· cited 41×
• Johnston v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1962-05-09· cited 19×