Washington Supreme Court· 9/22/1977
Sisley v. San Juan County
Citations
- 569 P.2d 712
- 89 Wash. 2d 78
- 7 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20821
- 1977 Wash. LEXIS 975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing DNS issued for construction of a marina and remanding for preparation of an EIS
- reversing DNS issued for construction of a marina and remanding for preparation of an EIS
- An EIS merely assures a full disclosure and consideration of environmental information prior to the construction of the project.
- \clearly erroneous\ negative declaration as to 94-slip marina and support facilities in a biologically unique and sensitive area
- SEPA supplements the permit system of the SMA
- SEPA supplements the permit system of the SMA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1993-11-04· cited 140×
- Kucera v. State, Dept. of Transp.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-03-16· cited 86×
- Polygon Corp. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1978-05-18· cited 85×
- Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1980-07-10· cited 74×
- Asarco Inc. v. Air Quality CoalitionWashington Supreme Court· 1979-10-11· cited 53×
- Cougar Mountain Associates v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 42×
- City of Bellevue v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1978-11-09· cited 41×
- Anderson v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-09· cited 37×
- Hayden v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 1980-07-10· cited 30×
- Department of Natural Resources v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1979-10-04· cited 26×
- Gardner v. Pierce County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-09-12· cited 21×
- Bellevue Farm Owners Association v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-31· cited 18×
- Bellevue Farm Owners Ass'n v. Shorelines Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-31· cited 17×
- Kettle Range Conservation Group v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-23· cited 17×
- City of Olympia v. Thurston County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 15×
- Cook v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-10-09· cited 14×
- City of Olympia v. THURSTON COUNTY BD.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 14×
- Chuckanut Conservancy v. WASH. STATE DNRCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-24· cited 13×
- Chuckanut Conservancy v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-24· cited 13×
- Murden Cove Preservation Ass'n v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-19· cited 12×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-27· cited 106×
- Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-12-13· cited 95×
- Stempel v. Department of Water ResourcesWashington Supreme Court· 1973-03-29· cited 75×
- Farm Supply Distributors, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1974-02-14· cited 69×
- Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-04· cited 64×
- Narrowsview Preservation Ass'n v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court· 1974-09-26· cited 56×
- Merkel v. Port of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-27· cited 18×
Other cases named Sisley v. San Juan County
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.