Kucera v. State, Dept. of Transp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiffs were not entitled to injunctive relief when money damages were an adequate remedy
• “As SEPA itself contemplates the balancing of economic and environmental factors, a trial court too must apply traditional equitable principles and weigh competing interests when asked to enjoin a challenged action.”
• to 7 The State requested review of two questions: (1) “Does State v. Houston- Sconiers authorize a sentencing court to ignore the indeterminate sentencing scheme for serious sex offenses and instead impose determinate sentencing, which is legislated for other crimes?” and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).