Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “clearly erroneous” standard of review is appropriate in this context
• recognizing that the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review is appropriate in this context
• modifying Narrowsview Preservation Ass'n v. Tacoma, 84 Wn.2d 416, 526 P.2d 897 (1974)
• under clearly erroneous standard the court may reverse if review of the whole record leaves it with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made
• negative threshold declaration was \clearly erroneous\ as to 52-acre heavily wooded and unpopulated area transformed into a residential suburban neighborhood
• standard of review of “negative threshold determinations” governed by “clearly erroneous” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).