Sink v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the statutory language and legislative history did not support punitive and compensatory damages in ADA retaliation claims
• finding the plaintiff exhausted his “record of” disability claim where his charge of discrimination alleged he retired from his previous employment with permanent disability and his current employer refused to accept a doctor’s note clearing the plaintiff to return to work
• compensatory and punitive damages are not available for retaliatory discharge claim
• defendant justified in relying on cardiologist release despite conflict with treating physician’s release
• compensatory and punitive damages are not avail- able for retaliatory discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).