Horne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Circumstantial evidence is proof of certain facts and circumstances from which the [jury] may infer that the ultimate facts in dispute existed or did not exist.” (quoting Baugh v. State, 961 So.2d 198, 203 n. 5 (Fla.2007)) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CASICA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30· cited 14×
• S.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-14· cited 12×
• Singleton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-11· cited 6×
• Finley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-28· cited 2×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-09· cited 2×
• Meyer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-02· cited 1×
• SB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Darling v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-03· cited 134×
• Reynolds v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-05-18· cited 98×
• Baugh v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 42×
• Meyer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-02· cited 1×