Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 4/2/1997
Simmons v. State
Citations
- 944 S.W.2d 11
- 1996 WL 687023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the State established the identity of the cocaine through evidence of its proper chain of custody and the cocaine was contraband seized from the defendant, in part because defendant offered no evidence of tampering that might affect admissibility
- holding that the State established the identity of the cocaine through evidence of its proper chain of custody and the cocaine was contraband seized from the defendant, in part because defendant offered no evidence of tampering that might affect admissibility
- sentence of fifty years’ confinement and $5,000 for delivery of cocaine not grossly disproportionate considering the defendant’s criminal history
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramey, Holcomb, Hadden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
191 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-03-16· cited 413×
- Trevino v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-10-13· cited 295×
- Willis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-05-10· cited 149×
- Winchester v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-02-14· cited 132×
- Alberto v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-02-13· cited 87×
- Sullivan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-08-20· cited 85×
- Dunn v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1999-08-04· cited 76×
- Silva v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-04-21· cited 74×
- Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-04-21· cited 66×
- Manuel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2011-08-31· cited 60×
- Jacobs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-05-22· cited 48×
- Mendoza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-03-28· cited 47×
- Kingsbury v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-03-01· cited 36×
- Contreras v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-23· cited 8×
- Smedley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-02-07· cited 5×
- Joseph Bernard Harris v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-10-23
- in the Matter of S.D.C.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-05-08
- David Benson Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-04-10
- Iriz Samantha Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-01-11
- Jack Warren Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-08-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- Heitman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-26· cited 1,035×
- Robert McGruder v. Steven W. PuckettFifth Circuit· 1992-02-27· cited 696×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-13· cited 560×
- Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-20· cited 511×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-14· cited 413×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-11-08· cited 321×
- Schwarz v. Florida Supreme CourtSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 207×
- Lackey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-11-09· cited 157×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-10· cited 146×
- Ex Parte MangrumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-12· cited 54×
- Murray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1993-09-21· cited 41×
- Cuba v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-08-10· cited 30×
- Irvine v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-06-10· cited 26×
- Alvarez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-10-20· cited 21×
- Fiori v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-11-28· cited 9×
- State v. LewisTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1996-02-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.