Skip to main content
· 7/3/2014

Simants v. State

Citations

  • 329 P.3d 1033
  • 2014 WL 2993544
  • 2014 Alas. App. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial courts must subject probation conditions implicating constitutional rights to special scrutiny and “affirmatively consider, and have good reason for rejecting, any less restrictive alternatives”
  • holding that “the constitutional importance of a person’s right to maintain familial relationships” required trial court to affirmatively demonstrate that the defendant was a danger to her children before restricting familial contact as a condition of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mannheimer, Allard, Hanley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.