Skip to main content
· 3/30/1967

Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.

Citations

  • 425 P.2d 891
  • 70 Wash. 2d 915
  • 1967 Wash. LEXIS 1138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • measuring damages as the difference in the value of the note as represented and its true value
  • measuring damages as the difference in the value of the note as represented and its true value
  • identifying the elements of a fraud claim, including the fraud 23 victim’s reliance on the truth of the false representation and consequent damage
  • explaining one element of fraud is “‘intent that [the fraudulent statement] should be acted on by the person to whom it is made’” (quoting Webster v. L. Romano Eng’g Corp., 178 Wash. 118, 120, 34 P.2d 428 (1934)
  • Stevens - quoting Webster v. L. Romano Eng' g Corp., 178 Wash. 118, 120 -21, 34 P. 2d 428 ( 1934)
  • in an action for fraud in real estate loan transaction, measure of damages is not restoration of the purchase price, but rather the difference between the value of the security had it been as represented and the actual value of the security received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.