Skip to main content
· 2/14/1979

Seals v. Seals

Citations

  • 590 P.2d 1301
  • 22 Wash. App. 652
  • 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding wife damages based on the value of certain community property that had not been disclosed by husband during dissolution proceedings
  • \A fiduciary duty does not cease upon contemplation of the dissolution of a marriage.\
  • “Where a party ... in clear and unambiguous terms . . . asserts the nonexistence of a fact, of which that party has or should have knowledge, the requesting party may rely on such statements. The exercise of reasonable diligence does not require a party to look behind the answers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Munson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.