Shupe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking portion of sentence ordering that no gain time be allowed until restitution was paid
• striking portion of sentence ordering that no gain time be allowed until restitution was paid
• award of gain time is solely within the province of the Department of Corrections, and a trial court is without authority to prevent gain time
• the trial court had no authority to order that gain-time shall not be ordered until restitution is paid
• “[A] trial court is without authority to prevent gain time [as] the award of gain time, pursuant to section 944.275, Florida Statutes, is solely within the province of the Department of Corrections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-10· cited 26×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-28· cited 11×
• State v. McKenzie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-07· cited 8×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-17· cited 5×
• Corley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 4×
• Crosby v. Harvey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-17· cited 3×
• Kenneth Purdy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-23
• Kenneth Purdy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-08
• James Mobley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Valdes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-14· cited 10×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-05· cited 8×
• Causey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-11· cited 4×