Skip to main content
· 1/7/1988

Shupe v. State

Citations

  • 517 So. 2d 780
  • 1988 WL 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant could not be convicted of both grand theft and robbery for same purse-snatching, and one conviction would have had to be vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.