Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If, in sentencing, a court attempts to bar or grant gain time, such language has been treated as surplusage or stricken.” (citing Shupe, 516 So. 2d at 73; Singletary v. Coronado, 673 So. 2d 924, 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stephens v. Sabol
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-03-24· cited 4×
• Kenneth Purdy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-01-23
• JAMES D. SHIMKO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-17
• Kenneth Purdy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-08
• James Mobley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-10· cited 26×
• Shupe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-03· cited 9×
• Singletary v. Coronado
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 8×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-10· cited 8×
• Singletary v. Marchetti
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-11· cited 5×