Shupe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant could not be convicted of both grand theft and robbery for same purse-snatching, and one conviction would have had to be vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ghent v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-06· cited 6×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-19· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• Carawan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
• Vivona v. Conboy
  Supreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 351×
• Bundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 113×
• Houser v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-22· cited 106×
• Mills v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 76×
• Bundy v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 44×
• State v. Rodriquez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 23×
• State v. Boivin
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-27· cited 20×
• Blankenship v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-03· cited 4×
• Finfrock v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-04· cited 4×