Skip to main content

Shults v. State

Citations

  • 616 P.2d 388
  • 96 Nev. 742
  • 1980 Nev. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because “the prosecution is entitled to present a full and accurate account of the circumstances surrounding a crime,” the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting other crimes evidence that was relevant to motive (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • providing that under plain error review, even when the district court errs in receiving evidence, this court will not reverse where the complained of error did not affect the appellant’s substantial rights
  • relevant and necessary evidence may be presented to show “a full and accurate account” of the circumstances surrounding the crime
  • victim's state of mind is at issue when defendant claims self-defense, accidental death, or suicide
  • victim’s state of mind is at issue when defendant claims self-defense, accidental death, or suicide
  • “But such evidence is admissible if relevant for some purpose other than to show an accused’s criminal character and the probability that he committed the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manoukian, Mowbray, Thompson, Gunderson, Batjer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.