Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/12/1978
Shoup v. Shoup
Citations
- 390 A.2d 814
- 257 Pa. Super. 263
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- child’s preference not controlling but a factor to be considered along with child’s maturity and intelligence
- ten-year-old child not considered mature enough to have preference carry much weight
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Wesley J. K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-21· cited 74×
- In Re Custody of FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-19· cited 58×
- Morris v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-05· cited 55×
- In Re Custody of WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-28· cited 46×
- Constant A. v. Paul C.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-14· cited 40×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berman v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-24· cited 39×
- In Re Custody of TemosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-10· cited 39×
- Hugo v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-06-12· cited 35×
- Palmer v. TokarekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-18· cited 27×
- In Re ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-10· cited 25×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Grimes v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-10-03· cited 25×
- Hooks v. EllerbeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 24×
- K.L.H. v. G.D.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-26· cited 22×
- In Re DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-16· cited 18×
- Wenger v. WengerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 14×
- Parks v. ParksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-13· cited 12×
- Wrecsics v. BroughtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-06· cited 9×
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-10· cited 8×
- Zaubi v. HoejmeW.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-11-17· cited 2×
- Klh v. GdhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-26
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 224×
- Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 166×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-16· cited 142×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-30· cited 119×
- Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 101×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Parikh v. ParikhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-10-04· cited 99×
- Com. Ex Rel. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 95×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Ulmer v. UlmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-11· cited 72×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-05-23· cited 69×
- Tobias v. TobiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 67×
- In Re Custody of MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 60×
- Tomlinson v. TomlinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 53×
- Davidyan v. DavidyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-17· cited 48×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bowser v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-27· cited 37×
- Cochran AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-11-25· cited 35×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Rainford v. CirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-16· cited 34×
- Carlisle AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 22×
- Sweeney v. SweeneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-28· cited 19×
- Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-16· cited 17×
- Jones v. KniessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.