Skip to main content

Gunter v. Gunter

Citations

  • 240 Pa. Super. 382
  • 361 A.2d 307
  • 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court improperly relied on untranscribed statement of child
  • record failed to disclose whether trial court considered possible psychological bonding of child to couple who had physical custody of child
  • “It is not unusual in custody cases to discern a desire by the parents to hurt each other, and to use the child to do so.”
  • record failed to disclose whether trial court considered possible psychological bonding of child to couple who had physical custody of child
  • the record was deficient where “[n]o one, such as a social worker for the court, inspected the mother’s or father’s respective residence and described them to the court.”
  • doctrine of waiver does not apply in child custody proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Gunter v. Gunter

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.