Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/10/2001
Shoop v. Kittitas County
Citations
- 30 P.3d 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in contrast to subject matter jurisdiction of the superior court, venue is appropriate subject for legislation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 76×
- In re the Marriage of McDermottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-07-15· cited 55×
- Marriage Of: Donna L. Tupper (nka Hagar) v. Michael L. TupperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-12-29· cited 25×
- Smale v. NoretepCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-01· cited 14×
- In Re of GraySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-04-08· cited 7×
- Newlon v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-03-15· cited 7×
- State v. PeltierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-16· cited 7×
- Eubanks v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-18· cited 5×
- In re the Marriage of NewlonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-03-15· cited 5×
- Teresa Banowsky v. Guy Backstrom, D.c., D/b/a...Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-07-16· cited 3×
- Porter v. BoissoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-16· cited 2×
- Wendy A. Mcdermott, App. v. Justin J. Mcdermott, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-07-15
- State Of Washington v. Joseph A. PeltierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-09-16
- In Re The Dependency Of: L.s., P.a., App. v. L.s., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-10-02
- Ethan Boudreaux v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-26
- Heidi Kaufman v. Geoffrey KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-27
- Arends v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2025-08-14
- In the Matter of the Detention of C.E.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2025-09-09
- Stan Schiff, M.d., Ph.d., Resp/cross-pet V. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. Et Ano, Pet/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2022-11-28
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 217×
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 163×
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 161×
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
- Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 130×
- Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-15· cited 123×
- State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-11· cited 77×
- In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 66×
- Matter of FlemingWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 62×
- In Re the Marriage of Major & MajorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-10-25· cited 49×
- In Re the Marriage of OrtizWashington Supreme Court· 1987-08-06· cited 42×
- Cossel v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 38×
- O'DONOGHUE v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1965-09-02· cited 37×
- Russell v. Marenakos Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1963-04-11· cited 37×
- City of Seattle v. HeslerWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 33×
- Inland Foundry Co. v. Spokane County Air Pollution Control AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-30· cited 26×
- Sievers v. City of Mountlake TerraceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-01· cited 23×
- State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-23· cited 21×
- Aydelotte v. AudetteWashington Supreme Court· 1988-03-10· cited 15×
- State ex rel. McWhorter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1920-09-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.